Skip to Content

John

Changes this passage only. Set your default for every passage.

John 1

1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Commentary · verse 1

The Word was: in the beginning, with God, and was God.

Doctrine: This established Jesus' pre-existence before His natural birth. Remember, "In the beginning" (from Genesis 1:1) did not mean "the first moment of time." It meant "shaking," which meant when all the physical matter that would ever exist was created. Jesus existed before all the physical matter ever existed, which is known as "pre-existent."

2The same was in the beginning with God.

3All things were made through him; and without him was not anything made that hath been made.

2The same was in the beginning with God.

3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Commentary · verses 2-3

God's Word or the Word created all things. God's Word is truth. Truth is facts that create in the long term (a right WHAT with a right HOW/WHY). God the Father created everything through Jesus.

Doctrine: Creation requires more than one person because profitability is an effect of an exchange. The devil cannot create because he cannot come into agreement and exchange with anyone. The devil can only destroy.

4In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

4In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

Commentary · verse 4

In Him (the Word) is life (the ability to repair). Life is the light (energy) of men.

Doctrine: The ability to repair is from Jesus because it is an effect of truth.

5And the light shineth in the darkness; and the darkness apprehended it not.

5And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

Commentary · verse 5

Doctrine: The word "light" meant "to be made manifest"...to become apparent and realized. "Darkness" meant "obscurity"...to not be able to be realized.

6There came a man, sent from God, whose name was John.

7The same came for witness, that he might bear witness of the light, that all might believe through him.

6There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.

7The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.

Commentary · verses 6-7

Doctrine: John the Baptist was sent by God to be a witness of the Light (the Word) that all men would believe. Jesus did not facilitate His own purpose and progress. John the Baptist was sent to do that.

8He was not the light, but came that he might bear witness of the light.

8He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.

Commentary · verse 8

John the Baptist was not the Light (the Word). This was a clarification of the previous verse.

9There was the true light, even the light which lighteth every man, coming into the world.

10He was in the world, and the world was made through him, and the world knew him not.

9That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

10He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.

Commentary · verses 9-10

This was a wonderful summary of the previous seven verses. Jesus (Light/Word) was physically in the world, which was made through Him, yet the world did not know Him.

11He came unto his own, and they that were his own received him not.

11He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

Commentary · verse 11

Jesus came to those who claimed to be following the Law, yet they did not receive Him. However, there were some that did receive Him.

12But as many as received him, to them gave he the right to become children of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

12But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

13Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

Commentary · verses 12-13

John summarized the entire history of Jesus in thirteen verses! He began from "the beginning," covered His time on earth, and concluded with the eternal effects on every person because of their response to Jesus.

Notice, verse 13 described Four Thought Processes:

  1. blood (destructive/evil

  2. flesh (animal)

  3. man (human)

  4. God (godly).

Next, John returned to his narrative...

14And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father), full of grace and truth.

14And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Commentary · verse 14

Doctrine: Jesus was full of grace and truth. Some believe the definition of "grace" is "unmerited favor." Jesus would not be full of "unmerited favor." Actually, "grace" is "the divine influence upon the heart, and its reflection in the life." Jesus was definitely full of this grace, which would also be truth because the influence was divine/from God.

15John beareth witness of him, and crieth, saying, This was he of whom I said, He that cometh after me is become before me: for he was before me.

15John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.

Commentary · verse 15

Doctrine: John the Baptist knew Jesus was the Messiah. John the Baptist said Jesus was before him even though John was born first. The word before meant "first in rank/priority." John the Baptist knew Jesus was greater than him.

16For of his fulness we all received, and grace for grace.

16And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.

Commentary · verse 16

Doctrine: Because of Jesus' fulness of grace and truth we are able to receive grace (and truth) through the Holy Spirit.

17For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

17For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

Commentary · verse 17

Doctrine: Jesus Christ brought about a new dispensation: grace and truth through the Holy Spirit replaced the Dispensation of the Law.

18No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

18No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

Commentary · verse 18

Doctrine: Only Jesus, who is in the bosom (in the intimate presence) of the Father, has declared (unfolded, revealed) the Father to us. Also, Jesus was begotten of God, of the same substance as God the Father. God did not create Jesus. People create statues; they beget children. This also meant that Jesus came after God the Father, but before all the physical matter was created. However, since God the Father always existed, Jesus essentially always existed because He existed at least a moment after God the Father first existed. In five verses, John explained the effect on us of Jesus' coming in bodily form.

Next, John returned to his narrative...

Doctrines on this passage

19And this is the witness of John, when the Jews sent unto him from Jerusalem priests and Levites to ask him, Who art thou?

20And he confessed, and denied not; and he confessed, I am not the Christ.

19And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou?

20And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.

Commentary · verses 19-20

John the Baptist directly confessed he was not the Christ.

21And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elijah? And he saith, I am not. Art thou the prophet? And he answered, No.

21And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.

Commentary · verse 21

Doctrine: People sent by God do not directly testify of themselves because that would not be humble. Jesus never plainly said, "I am the Christ." When they asked John the Baptist whether he was Elijah or a prophet, John's response was that he was not Elijah and he was not a prophet. Notice, John the Baptist did not initiate this statement like he did when he stated "I am not the Christ." In Matthew 11:7-9, Jesus said John the Baptist was Elijah and John the Baptist was a prophet. Either John the Baptist or Jesus lied or people sent by God do not directly testify of themselves. Which do you believe?

22They said therefore unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself?

23He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said Isaiah the prophet.

22Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself?

23He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias.

Commentary · verses 22-23

John the Baptist was asked to testify "of thyself." His response was to quote Isaiah 40:3. Notice, John the Baptist still did not directly testify "of thyself."

24And they had been sent from the Pharisees.

25And they asked him, and said unto him, Why then baptizest thou, if thou art not the Christ, neither Elijah, neither the prophet?

26John answered them, saying, I baptize in water: in the midst of you standeth one whom ye know not, 27even he that cometh after me, the latchet of whose shoe I am not worthy to unloose.

24And they which were sent were of the Pharisees.

25And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet?

26John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not;

27He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe’s latchet I am not worthy to unloose.

Commentary · verses 24-27

John the Baptist was a Semikah Rabbi. He had the authority to widen Doctrine. John's baptism was similar to a ceremonial cleansing the religious leaders would do for new converts. The Pharisees wanted to know by what authority John was able to cleanse new converts if he was not the Messiah, Elijah, or a prophet...and did not ask for permission from the religious leaders. John's response was that the Pharisees did not understand Doctrine well enough to bridge the gap between John's and Jesus' identity (which made them unable to state it directly) and the misunderstanding of the Pharisees. Basically, the Pharisees pursued man-made doctrine and traditions, which made them unable to understand events that followed God's Will and Word.

28These things were done in Bethany beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing.

29On the morrow he seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold, the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world!

28These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing.

29The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.

Commentary · verses 28-29

Doctrine: Jesus was the prophesied Passover Lamb. John the Baptist saw Jesus coming and declared "Behold, the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world!" Again, John the Baptist knew Jesus was the Messiah and used a reference from God's Word to make others aware.

Doctrines on this passage

30This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man who is become before me: for he was before me.

31And I knew him not; but that he should be made manifest to Israel, for this cause came I baptizing in water.

30This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me.

31And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water.

Commentary · verses 30-31

Doctrine: The only reason John the Baptist was baptizing was to make Israel realize Jesus was the Messiah.

32And John bare witness, saying, I have beheld the Spirit descending as a dove out of heaven; and it abode upon him.

32And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.

Commentary · verse 32

Jesus' baptism. This was definitely a more concise account of this event than the other three Gospels.

33And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize in water, he said unto me, Upon whomsoever thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and abiding upon him, the same is he that baptizeth in the Holy Spirit.

34And I have seen, and have borne witness that this is the Son of God.

33And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.

34And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.

Commentary · verses 33-34

John the Baptist explained that God gave him a sign of who was the Son of God. John testified that he saw this sign upon Jesus, so he directly stated, "...this is the Son of God." A Rabbi became a Semikah Rabbi through the agreement of two other Semikah's. During Jesus' baptism, John the Baptist and God agreed to make Jesus a Semikah Rabbi. This began Jesus' ministry. However, we will see that this event did not begin Jesus' public ministry. Between verses 34 and 35 was when Jesus was tempted by the devil.

35Again on the morrow John was standing, and two of his disciples; 36and he looked upon Jesus as he walked, and saith, Behold, the Lamb of God!

35Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples;

36And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God!

Commentary · verses 35-36

John the Baptist declared Jesus as the Lamb of God again.

37And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.

38And Jesus turned, and beheld them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? And they said unto him, Rabbi (which is to say, being interpreted, Teacher), where abidest thou?

37And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.

38Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou?

Commentary · verses 37-38

Two of John the Baptist's disciples followed Jesus. One was Andrew the other was John, the author of this Gospel. John referred to John the Baptist as "John" and did not refer to himself by name at all. Notice, we have seen a major theme of this Gospel was that a person sent by God does not facilitate their own purpose and progress. Likewise, John the author did not do this for himself throughout this entire Gospel Account.

39He saith unto them, Come, and ye shall see. They came therefore and saw where he abode; and they abode with him that day: it was about the tenth hour.

40One of the two that heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother.

39He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour.

40One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother.

Commentary · verses 39-40

Andrew's brother was Simon Peter. Every boy in Israel memorized the Torah from the ages of five to twelve years old. If they succeeded, they continued memorizing the rest of the scriptures. If they did not succeed, they began to learn their father's trade. Once the boy reached the age of fifteen years old, he began searching out a Rabbi to teach him until the age of thirty years old, which was when they could become a Rabbi/scribe/Torah teacher. Andrew would have been about fifteen years old. His brother was older and had already given up becoming a Rabbi. He even got married.

41He findeth first his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messiah (which is, being interpreted, Christ).

42He brought him unto Jesus. Jesus looked upon him, and said, Thou art Simon the son of John: thou shalt be called Cephas (which is by interpretation, Peter).

41He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.

42And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone.

Commentary · verses 41-42

Verse 41 implied that Andrew found his brother Simon before John found his brother James. Jesus changed Simon's name to "Cephas": Peter.

43On the morrow he was minded to go forth into Galilee, and he findeth Philip: and Jesus saith unto him, Follow me.

43The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me.

Commentary · verse 43

Galilee was the "Harvard" of Israel as it related to Rabbinical teaching. Jesus found Philip and said "Follow me."

44Now Philip was from Bethsaida, of the city of Andrew and Peter.

45Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.

44Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.

45Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.

Commentary · verses 44-45

Philip found Nathanael and told him they had found the One who Moses in the Law and prophets wrote about. These disciples began to follow Jesus, but Jesus had not called them to be His students.

46And Nathanael said unto him, Can any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see.

47Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!

46And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see.

47Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!

Commentary · verses 46-47

Jesus saw Nathanael and said he was an Israelite in whom was no guile (craft, deceit), Nathanael had a right WHAT with a right HOW/WHY. Nathanael also spoke his mind ("Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?") instead of hiding what he thought.

48Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee.

48Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee.

Commentary · verse 48

Doctrine: Jesus could see natural things in a supernatural fashion. Nathanael wanted to know how Jesus knew him. Jesus saw him under a fig tree before Philip found Nathanael.

49Nathanael answered him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art King of Israel.

49Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel.

Commentary · verse 49

This information was enough for Nathanael to call Jesus "Rabbi" and proclaim that He was the Son of God, the King of Israel.

50Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee underneath the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.

51And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Ye shall see the heaven opened, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.

50Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.

51And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.

Commentary · verses 50-51

Jesus referenced an even greater example of seeing in the supernatural.

Up and down arrows move between verses, Enter selects one, Shift with an arrow takes in a run. Tab then reaches Save, Add Note and Copy.