Salvation
Doctrine #30: Contrastive Thinking
Doctrine #30
Doctrine #30 Read
Do you believe that God is Right and Just? If God is always and completely Right, what does that mean about you? Sometimes you are right, sometimes your actions show wisdom, and sometimes they do not. Did you know you have to be willing to be wrong in order to be right in the long term? If you were always and completely right you would have no need for God.
Do you believe it is better to be right OR be willing to consider you are wrong? How does God think?
Overview
In order to think like God, we need to intentionally prove ourselves wrong. We all have the ability to look contrastively because we do it perfectly to everyone else without trying. Using this ability on ourselves is a choice. Choosing not to look contrastively on ourselves is a choice to follow the flesh. The opposite of contrastive thinking is comparative thinking: looking only for how you can be right.
Discussion Question
Do you believe you are trying to prove yourself wrong?
Scripture
Proverbs 21:2-3
ChapterRead the ChapterChanges this passage only. Set your default for every passage.
2Every way of a man is right in his own eyes; But Jehovah weigheth the hearts.
3To do righteousness and justice Is more acceptable to Jehovah than sacrifice.
2Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts.
3To do justice and judgment is more acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice.
Commentary
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verse 2
Man (in the flesh) saw his actions as right but God saw the effects of these actions (causes) in the heart. God could also direct the actions of a person in pride because they were completely predictable and on the wrong side of Justice, which allowed God to respond to them through Justice.
Commentary · verse 3
Doing Right and Just actions was better than giving up something to God. God wanted all of us to be like Him: Right and Just.
Proverbs 14:12-15
ChapterRead the ChapterChanges this passage only. Set your default for every passage.
12There is a way which seemeth right unto a man; But the end thereof are the ways of death.
13Even in laughter the heart is sorrowful; And the end of mirth is heaviness.
14The backslider in heart shall be filled with his own ways; And a good man shall be satisfied from himself.
15The simple believeth every word; But the prudent man looketh well to his going.
12There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.
13Even in laughter the heart is sorrowful; and the end of that mirth is heaviness.
14The backslider in heart shall be filled with his own ways: and a good man shall be satisfied from himself.
15The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going.
Commentary
Comparative thinking results in death, because a man will continue to go down the road where he feels justified. Remember, thinking like God is the opposite of our human thinking! The simple (naive) are comparative because they believe every word, but the prudent man is contrastive on every word. There are people who pride themselves in being skeptics. Are they skeptics of the words they use, or only of the words of others?
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verses 11-12
The way that seemed right to man, that led to death, was the way that caused man to think he knew all he needed to know. He thought he was in need of nothing.
Commentary · verses 13-15
The simple believed every word because they were not looking for a HOW/WHY. The prudent looked for the HOW/WHY. Do you know HOW/WHY you are doing what you are doing?
1 Corinthians 8:1-3
ChapterRead the ChapterChanges this passage only. Set your default for every passage.
1Now concerning things sacrificed to idols: We know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but love edifieth.
2If any man thinketh that he knoweth anything, he knoweth not yet as he ought to know; 3but if any man loveth God, the same is known by him.
1Now as touching things offered unto idols, we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth.
2And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.
3But if any man love God, the same is known of him.
Commentary
We all have WHAT's. Paul stated that when you think you know it all, that is proof that you don't know it all. Someone who feels like they know it all is comparative. We will never know it all, so we ought to remain contrastive.
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verse 1
The next topic the church in Corinth wrote about that Paul wanted to address was "things sacrificed to idols."
Doctrine: Knowledge caused pride. The devil had knowledge, which led to pride. The devil does not have understanding or wisdom, both of which creates.
Love builds up. Love creates and is profitable. Paul's answer to this question was complex and covered three chapters. Paul's ultimate answer to this issue was stated in this first verse of the first of these three chapters: Love edifieth. The guiding principle behind the answer to this question was love. However, people erred because they thought the answer was knowledge. Remember, Paul spent the first three chapters of this letter with an introduction that proved man's wisdom was foolishness when it came to spiritual issues. Again, Paul created that context in order to frame his answer to this question...
Commentary · verse 2
Doctrine: If any man thinks he knows anything so well he cannot be taught anything new, then he is proving he does not know everything. We will never know everything and we ought to always be willing and able to consider we could be wrong. That is humility.
Commentary · verse 3
Those who love God are known to be humble. Again, Paul contrasted knowledge and love, and love was the better option.
Proverbs 9:7-8
ChapterRead the ChapterChanges this passage only. Set your default for every passage.
7He that correcteth a scoffer getteth to himself reviling; And he that reproveth a wicked man getteth himself a blot.
8Reprove not a scoffer, lest he hate thee: Reprove a wise man, and he will love thee.
7He that reproveth a scorner getteth to himself shame: and he that rebuketh a wicked man getteth himself a blot.
8Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee.
Commentary
A scoffer and wicked man won't respond well to contrastive thinking. Correcting and reproof are examples of being contrastive. Someone who is wise desires their actions and decisions to be led by God and if they need to be corrected they will appreciate it! You will be giving them an opportunity to become more wise!
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verses 7-8
A wise man loved being confronted. This man would understand the value of being shown why he was wrong. When you are shown why you are wrong you have the opportunity to become more right. Remember, every time David was confronted with his sin, he chose to humble himself and grow.
Judges 6:36-40
ChapterRead the ChapterChanges this passage only. Set your default for every passage.
36And Gideon said unto God, If thou wilt save Israel by my hand, as thou hast spoken, 37behold, I will put a fleece of wool on the threshing-floor; if there be dew on the fleece only, and it be dry upon all the ground, then shall I know that thou wilt save Israel by my hand, as thou hast spoken.
38And it was so; for he rose up early on the morrow, and pressed the fleece together, and wrung the dew out of the fleece, a bowlful of water.
39And Gideon said unto God, Let not thine anger be kindled against me, and I will speak but this once: let me make trial, I pray thee, but this once with the fleece; let it now be dry only upon the fleece, and upon all the ground let there be dew.
40And God did so that night: for it was dry upon the fleece only, and there was dew on all the ground.
36And Gideon said unto God, If thou wilt save Israel by mine hand, as thou hast said,
37Behold, I will put a fleece of wool in the floor; and if the dew be on the fleece only, and it be dry upon all the earth beside, then shall I know that thou wilt save Israel by mine hand, as thou hast said.
38And it was so: for he rose up early on the morrow, and thrust the fleece together, and wringed the dew out of the fleece, a bowl full of water.
39And Gideon said unto God, Let not thine anger be hot against me, and I will speak but this once: let me prove, I pray thee, but this once with the fleece; let it now be dry only upon the fleece, and upon all the ground let there be dew.
40And God did so that night: for it was dry upon the fleece only, and there was dew on all the ground.
Commentary
In the first section of the passage, Gideon got the sign he wanted: the fleece was wet. However, he confirmed it with a contrastive sign, exactly the opposite. Do you think this was something to look up to, or do you think Gideon lacked faith? This was an example of being contrastive. This event was even in the Faith Hall of Fame in Hebrews 11! Gideon was contrastive.
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verses 1-40
This chapter covered Gideon's call to service.
Commentary · verses 35-38
This was where we got the term "putting out a fleece"...or "fleece". Gideon asked for a sign from God to determine an action Gideon was going to take. The point of a fleece is to determine God's Will for a situation.
Commentary · verses 39-40
Gideon asked for a second fleece that was the opposite of the first. God answered it. Gideon knew this was God. These set of signs (fleeces) were so he was sure God wanted to save Israel through him. Gideon literally put out two fleeces and God answered his requests. Gideon was an example to us of a person with great faith. He was listed in Hebrews 11:32 in what has been referred to as the "Faith Hall of Fame."
Stating your will and then asking God for a confirmatory sign is not proof of little faith, it is proof of great faith. Asking for signs without stating your will is proof of being faithless according to Jesus: Matthew 12:39 and Matthew 16:4. The issue gets down to the HOW/WHY of asking for a sign. Is it to build my faith or is it to test/try God?
Commentary · verse 40
Judges 4-6 covered two more Judges: Deborah and Gideon.
Matthew 26:39-42
ChapterRead the ChapterChanges this passage only. Set your default for every passage.
39And he went forward a little, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass away from me: nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt.
40And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them sleeping, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour?
41Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.
42Again a second time he went away, and prayed, saying, My Father, if this cannot pass away, except I drink it, thy will be done.
39And he went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.
40And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour?
41Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.
42He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done.
Commentary
Jesus prayed the first time if it would be possible He would not have to go to the cross. Then when He prayed the second time, He asked if it cannot pass from Him, and He was the only person who could drink of the cup, then He would go to the cross. Jesus was contrastive from the first prayer when He prayed the second prayer.
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verses 36-39
Jesus knew He would have to be crucified to fulfill prophecy, so He was not looking for a way to avoid crucifixion. Satan had entered Judas and God the Father knew how bad it would get for Jesus. When Jesus found out from the Father about the coming circumstances, Jesus asked if it be possible to be crucified under different circumstances. Jesus may also have been more specifically referring to His having to be separated from God when He died. Not only did Jesus love the Father greater than anyone ever has, He had never experienced separation from God the Father, and He had witnessed the devastation that occurred throughout history when people chose to be separated from the Father.
Commentary · verses 40-42
This time, Jesus prayed contrastively. He prayed if this cannot pass away. Either way, Jesus was willing to do God's Will God's way even though He did not want to.
Genesis 3:1-7
ChapterRead the ChapterChanges this passage only. Set your default for every passage.
1Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which Jehovah God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of any tree of the garden?
2And the woman said unto the serpent, Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat: 3but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
4And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil.
6And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat; and she gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat.
7And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig-leaves together, and made themselves aprons.
1Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
2And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
3But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
4And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
6And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
7And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.
Commentary
Eve looked from a comparative perspective at the fruit and found three reasons why it looked right: good for food, delight to eyes, make one wise. If she had looked at the one contrastive reason (you will die), she wouldn't have done it; this was God's command to them. Get ready for a huge point: All we know for sure is what isn't true! Think about it, things that aren't true can look true as we get more facts, facts that are comparative to what we believe. However, we know for sure something isn't true when we find a contradiction. That is why we need to actively look for a contradiction in order to think more like God, and not justify ourselves. We learned about deception being a Right WHAT with a Wrong or no HOW/WHY. We can be deceived if we are comparative with the Right WHAT we have.
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verse 1
An important aspect of Adam's job was to guard the garden. Did Adam let the serpent into the Garden or was the serpent already in the Garden prior to these interactions? The serpent was more subtle (crafty) than any beast of the field. If God can create everything, then giving the animals the ability to speak is easier.
The serpent said unto the woman, "Yea, hath God said,..." The serpent's first recorded words were questioning Eve's understanding of God's Word. Eve's understanding of God's Word came from Adam. Paul made it clear the serpent was not the devil. It would be unjust for the devil to deal directly with a human in paradise. Eve was influenced by Adam who was influenced by God. Some sources stated the serpent was influenced by a fallen angel...who was influenced by the devil. That would be Just.
Commentary · verses 2-4
This was a lie: This was a wrong WHAT. They would be separated from God's purpose for their lives...and they would feel it. Notice, it was not recorded in Genesis 1 that God stated not to touch the fruit. Whether Adam added this part or Eve added this herself, it was an example of how humans add to God's Word which dilutes the HOW/WHY and leads to deception. This was the first example of "man-made" religion.
Commentary · verse 5
This was a fact: a right WHAT stated without a HOW or a WHY. A right WHAT with a wrong (or no) HOW and WHY is deception. The woman was left to supply her own HOW and WHY.
Commentary · verse 6
Eve came up with three comparative reasons why to eat the fruit. She ignored the one contrastive reason why not: loss of paradise. These three reasons will be referenced as warnings in the New Testament. In fact, Jesus' temptation by the devil in the desert (Matthew 4) covered these same three reasons. Also, 1 John 2:17 covered these same three reasons as proof a person loved the world instead of God.
Eve ate of the fruit first. It appeared Adam may have been with Eve during the exchange with the serpent because the phrase "with her" implied physically present.
Commentary · verse 7
The serpent's comment from verse 5 was factually correct! The day they ate of the fruit: their eyes would be opened and they were like God in that they knew good and evil. However, they immediately "died"...they were separated from God's purpose for their lives and they felt it. The knowledge of good and evil was the ability to look long term...to see effects. When Adam and Eve saw the effects of being naked, they responded. Notice the first half of this verse was a factual presentation of the events. The second half of this verse documented Adam and Eve's response. Previous to this moment, Adam and Eve took direction from God and lived in the moment. They did not make long term plans. The second half of this verse showed that Adam and Eve made a decision to operate in their own strength: to be a first cause apart from God. This is the verse where Adam and Eve decided to commit idolatry. In this verse, "fig-leaves" meant "large leaves." Adam and Eve felt God's covering before they ate of the tree. After they ate of the tree, they decided to continue to feel this covering in their own strength. Obviously, they weren't thinking clearly because it would be immediately obvious to God they had done something in their own strength.
7And Jehovah said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered Jehovah, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.
8And Jehovah said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job? for there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and turneth away from evil.
9Then Satan answered Jehovah, and said, Doth Job fear God for nought?
10Hast not thou made a hedge about him, and about his house, and about all that he hath, on every side? thou hast blessed the work of his hands, and his substance is increased in the land.
11But put forth thy hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will renounce thee to thy face.
12And Jehovah said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thy hand. So Satan went forth from the presence of Jehovah.
7And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.
8And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil?
9Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, Doth Job fear God for nought?
10Hast not thou made an hedge about him, and about his house, and about all that he hath on every side? thou hast blessed the work of his hands, and his substance is increased in the land.
11But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face.
12And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thine hand. So Satan went forth from the presence of the LORD.
Commentary
God said Job was a good person as a cause. Satan said Job got things (effects) and that was the cause of him being good. Satan was focused on the WHAT, what Job had. Sound like animal thinking? God considered He was wrong and allowed Satan to take the things from Job in order to prove who was right. Satan took Job's possessions, sons, and daughters. Job was still good and Satan was proven wrong. However, Satan then responded with the following...
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verse 7
God asked Satan where he came from. Satan gave God a report that proved that Satan was not omnipresent. Satan can only be in one place at a time.
Commentary · verse 8
God asked Satan if he had considered Job. God Himself confirmed that Job was perfect, feared God, and turned away evil.
Commentary · verse 9
Satan's question essentially stated that Job feared God as an effect, not a cause. God stated Job was perfect because he feared God and the effects were that Job turned away from evil. What did Satan believe was the cause of Job fearing God?
Commentary · verses 10-11
Job had a hedge protecting him. This was analogous to the Garden of Eden which also was a "hedge" according to the etymology. Adam was protected by God in the Garden of Eden, but it was his responsibility to "dress and keep it" (Genesis 2:15). In that verse, keep meant "watch, guard, shepherd." Adam didn't do that because the serpent made his way in and led Adam astray. Here, the implication was that Job also had protection from God, however, Job did "keep" his "hedge" and Satan didn't have a way to get to Job. Satan needed "help."
Commentary · verse 11
Satan said that if God took away Job's possessions (HAVE) that Job would renounce God to His Face.
Remember that point: Satan said Job would renounce God to His Face.
Here was the Conflict:
- God believed Job was good and the effect was Job had possessions.
- Satan believed Job had possessions and the effect was that he was good.
What was the Resolution?
Commentary · verse 12
God gave Satan power over all that Job had. He stated this in front of the angels, who may have also been involved in the hedge of protection around Job. If God had just stated He was Right, then the way (HOW) God handled this situation would have been wrong. God had to consider He was wrong. The only way to prove He was Right was to prove Satan was wrong. This is known as a "contrastive" perspective. It was used throughout the Bible by those who were led by God. Basically, God had to allow Satan's plan to fail so that He was proven Right. Notice, God did not say He was wrong. Notice also, Job had not done anything to deserve this punishment: Satan was the cause, God provided the "help" in order to remain Right and Just, and Job would experience the unjust effects.
4And Satan answered Jehovah, and said, Skin for skin, yea, all that a man hath will he give for his life.
5But put forth thy hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will renounce thee to thy face.
6And Jehovah said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thy hand; only spare his life.
4And Satan answered the LORD, and said, Skin for skin, yea, all that a man hath will he give for his life.
5But put forth thine hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse thee to thy face.
6And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life.
Commentary
Satan then changed his answer to Job was good because he was able to DO things. God allowed Satan to take away Job's ability to DO things by covering him with boils. The rest of the Book of Job was an examination of what Job was thinking because he couldn't DO anything. At the end, we find out Job was still good. God was proven Right and Satan was proven Wrong. Notice, God isn't only Right and Just in WHAT He does, He is also Right and Just in HOW/WHY He does it. God was contrastive. We have the ability to think like God, which is the only way to prove you are right. If God was comparative then He never would have allowed Satan to torment Job to prove that He was Right.
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verses 4-5
Satan said that if God struck Job's body in order to limit what he could DO, Job would renounce God to His Face.
Second Conflict:
- God believed Job was good and the effect was Job did good things.
- Satan believed Job was able to DO good things and the effect was Job acted good.
Commentary · verse 6
Resolution: Again, God allowed Satan to do his plan. God put all of Job into Satan's hands except for his "life". Life was "the ability to repair." Job still had the ability to repair. Life could not have meant "existence" because there would have been no way for Satan to be right if Job's existence was ended.
38John said unto him, Teacher, we saw one casting out demons in thy name; and we forbade him, because he followed not us.
39But Jesus said, Forbid him not: for there is no man who shall do a mighty work in my name, and be able quickly to speak evil of me.
40For he that is not against us is for us.
38And John answered him, saying, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name, and he followeth not us: and we forbad him, because he followeth not us.
39But Jesus said, Forbid him not: for there is no man which shall do a miracle in my name, that can lightly speak evil of me.
40For he that is not against us is on our part.
Commentary
Jesus' response was contrastive on what the disciples said. Notice, the most secure people are able to be contrastive, Jesus being the most secure man that has ever lived. When a person is comparative, they are proving they are insecure. Think of the people who can never see another perspective than their own, do you think these people are insecure? God and Jesus both looked contrastively. Satan and our flesh look comparatively. Paul wrote in a contrastive fashion. In his shorter letters, the contrastive thinking was demonstrated within verses...
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verses 36-38
The Disciples forbade a man to cast out devils in Jesus' Name because the man did not follow them.
Commentary · verse 39
Jesus told them not to forbid the man. Anyone who does a miracle in Jesus' Name will not quickly speak evil of Jesus. This meant that man would think before he spoke evil of Jesus.
Commentary · verse 40
The man, although not physically following Jesus, must be with Jesus because whoever is not against Jesus is for Jesus. This meant that if you are not for Jesus, you must be against Jesus.
1 Thessalonians 2:1-8
ChapterRead the ChapterChanges this passage only. Set your default for every passage.
1For yourselves, brethren, know our entering in unto you, that it hath not been found vain: 2but having suffered before and been shamefully treated, as ye know, at Philippi, we waxed bold in our God to speak unto you the gospel of God in much conflict.
3For our exhortation is not of error, nor of uncleanness, nor in guile: 4but even as we have been approved of God to be intrusted with the gospel, so we speak; not as pleasing men, but God who proveth our hearts.
5For neither at any time were we found using words of flattery, as ye know, nor a cloak of covetousness, God is witness; 6nor seeking glory of men, neither from you nor from others, when we might have claimed authority as apostles of Christ.
7But we were gentle in the midst of you, as when a nurse cherisheth her own children: 8even so, being affectionately desirous of you, we were well pleased to impart unto you, not the gospel of God only, but also our own souls, because ye were become very dear to us.
1For yourselves, brethren, know our entrance in unto you, that it was not in vain:
2But even after that we had suffered before, and were shamefully entreated, as ye know, at Philippi, we were bold in our God to speak unto you the gospel of God with much contention.
3For our exhortation was not of deceit, nor of uncleanness, nor in guile:
4But as we were allowed of God to be put in trust with the gospel, even so we speak; not as pleasing men, but God, which trieth our hearts.
5For neither at any time used we flattering words, as ye know, nor a cloke of covetousness; God is witness:
6Nor of men sought we glory, neither of you, nor yet of others, when we might have been burdensome, as the apostles of Christ.
7But we were gentle among you, even as a nurse cherisheth her children:
8So being affectionately desirous of you, we were willing to have imparted unto you, not the gospel of God only, but also our own souls, because ye were dear unto us.
Commentary
Notice, Paul proved his point by first showing he didn't do the opposite. The only way to prove truth is to identify all the options and intentionally prove each wrong. Even if all the options appear to be right, by being contrastive you find which options are true. Whatever has a contradiction is wrong. If all the options have been identified, the only one that is non-contradictory has to be true. In Paul's longer letters, he was contrastive between chapters. Flattering words can deceive; remember when we learned about vain babblings?
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verse 1
Paul recognized that going to Thessalonica was profitable.
Commentary · verse 2
This circumstance was covered in Acts 16:16-40.
Commentary · verses 3-4
God will "prove" our hearts for our long term growth. Contrastive thinking: "all we know for sure is what is not true" involves proving something true by proving that every other way is wrong. Notice how Paul proved his point in the above sentence. First he proved his exhortation was approved of God by showing it was not in error, not in uncleanness, and not in guile. He stated that he was speaking as God because it was not as men. This was the earliest of Paul's epistles and he was contrastive within a sentence. In his later epistles (e.g., Romans), Paul was contrastive throughout the entire letter, dedicating entire chapters to the contrastive argument.
Commentary · verses 5-7
Again, Paul used contrastive thinking: he proved he was gentle by showing he was not flattering, not covetous, and not seeking glory of men.
Commentary · verse 8
Paul and his company were willing to give their own souls for the Thessalonians.
1What advantage then hath the Jew? or what is the profit of circumcision?
2Much every way: first of all, that they were intrusted with the oracles of God.
3For what if some were without faith? shall their want of faith make of none effect the faithfulness of God?
4God forbid: yea, let God be found true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy words, And mightest prevail when thou comest into judgment.
5But if our unrighteousness commendeth the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who visiteth with wrath? (I speak after the manner of men.)
6God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world?
7But if the truth of God through my lie abounded unto his glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner?
8and why not (as we are slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say), Let us do evil, that good may come? whose condemnation is just.
1What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?
2Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
3For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?
4God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
5But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man)
6God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world?
7For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?
8And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.
Commentary
Early in Paul's letter to the Romans he considered a point opposite of his own in order to eventually prove his point. He even included parenthetical comments to make sure the reader knew he didn't really believe what he was writing. He was considering it in order to identify the contradictions.
Swokowski Bible Commentary on this passage
Commentary · verse 1
In the previous chapter Paul showed that being a Jew opened a person up to greater judgment because they ought to know better. It sounded like being a Jew was worse than being a Gentile. Paul immediately addressed that thought by addressing the benefits of being a Jew.
Commentary · verse 2
Doctrine: God trusted the Jews with information to help everyone else. They were oracles of God.
Commentary · verses 3-4
Paul stated that the unfaithfulness of people did not negate God's decision to make the Jews the oracles of God. Paul referenced Psalm 116:11 and Psalm 51:4.
Commentary · verse 5
Paul argued the contrastive point. This was not his point. Paul seemed to realize that the reader may become confused by Paul arguing the opposite point, so he parenthetically commented to the reader that he was making an argument for his opponent in order to show how this perspective was flawed. Paul began with the premise that if our good works proved God's goodness, then God must not be able to punish. The contrastive question was "Was God not Right and not Just if He punished us?"
Commentary · verse 6
Paul then asked, "If God was not Right and not Just, how would He judge the world?" Judging is the assessing of the source of injustice and the beginning of the process of equaling out the injustice. God had to be able to punish if He was going to equal out the injustice.
Commentary · verses 7-8
Paul now stated with the contrastive perspective from verse 5: our good works proved God was good. This contrastive perspective was stated: "If my sinning leads to the truth of God growing, then I shouldn't be judged as a sinner." Paul parenthetically stated that people were slanderously stating that Paul was teaching this flawed perspective to rationalize why he preached that Gentiles could also be saved. Paul concluded that sentence by saying the condemnation was Just for those who slanderously stated this about Paul.
Closing Thoughts
Considering you are wrong, and actually being wrong are two different scenarios. When was the last time you considered you were wrong? When was the last time you changed a deeply held belief? If there was a belief you held that was based on the traditions of men and not the word of God, would you want to know?
If the God of the universe, who is always and completely Right, can consider that He is wrong, why is it so difficult for us? Maybe we are lacking something
If you think as a man it does not result in righteousness or justice. We have to be intentionally contrastive if we want to be right in the long term. God is Just, and He is the one that weigheth the heart, not us. When we weigh our hearts we appear right in our own eyes.